Studio Models USA
Complaints / Concerns
To Whom It May Concern:
This website has given me some great advice and I was
previously scammed by Manhattan
Model Search, and I am taking legal action
against them.
But my question is regarding Studio Models USA in
Philadelphia, PA.
Studio Models USA
209 N. 3rd Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106
P- 215-627-3244
F- 215-627-3248
www.studiomodelsusa.com
I recently went to Studio Models USA after seeing their
newspaper advertisement for open calls.
When I got there, the man who interviewed me took seven
minutes to discuss the company, and then gave me a card,
and told me to call at 7pm that night.
So I did. When I called, he told me that he and the
agency were interested in signing me, and asked if I
was available to come in on Saturday.
I said yes.
Now in the first interview, and also listed in the newspaper,
it says free screening, which is true, and then free
portfolio to those who qualify.
On the phone, however, he stated that the pictures are
free, but there is an registration fee of $95, and then
it would be $19.95/month for a contract of one year to
have my picture on their web page.
In the modeling industry are there things such as registration
fees? And is it legal to charge monthly fees for picture
preview for the clients?
On their web page I have yet to see any tear sheets
or models for any clients to look at.
For my next interview on Saturday he told me to bring
$114.
I didn't bring the agency any photos of myself, and
so he was just going off my face-to-face looks. Is this
also normal to just sign someone by the way they look
in person and no photos? And he's not even taking the
pictures on Saturday; he said that will be on another
day. Is this normal?
What would be the best way to handle this? I am sorry
I have so many questions, but if you could help, it would
be great.
R.B.
Aspiring Model
R.,
They want upfront fees, not just for one thing, but
two things, which is never a good sign, and also recurring
fees. This is what people do when they are looking for
fast, easy money, and a reliable cash flow.
In this case, the money is fast, because they get it
within days. The money is easy, because they do nothing
to get it. The cash flow is reliable, because it is a
fixed amount every month.
Advance registration fees are illegal in some states,
although in PA they may not be.
What exactly do they do in registration which makes
the registration worth $95? It doesn't take much time,
skill, or effort to "register" a new model.
Even if it were legal, it is not worth $95. It takes
less than an hour and it is not worth $95/hr.
The website advertising is probably a total waste of
money. There are scam businesses and websites which charge
$19.95/month in recurring fees for model comp card hosting.
Who do they think they are? AOL?
It may be worth $19.95/month for AOL or your ISP, if
you use the internet all the time, but in the case of
comp cards, agencies and clients probably never use them.
You have no way of knowing if your online portfolio is
being seen by potential clients.
This is why the industry standard for online advertising
is performance. Instead of paying recurring monthly fees
for advertising online, companies pay for results. Affiliate
programs, for example, reward affiliates when the consumer
buys something, not when they click on the banner ad
or view the website.
The industry standard for internet access is recurring
monthly fees, which may explain why some people are willing
to pay recurring fees for comp card hosting, but internet
access and portfolio hosting are completely different
and should not be confused. Recurring monthly fees for
internet access is fair; recurring monthly fees for advertising
internet comp cards is not.
More significantly, a lawyer recently pointed out it
is illegal in New York state for a modeling agency to
make money from advertising. It is illegal, therefore,
for a modeling agency to charge models for internet advertising.
(It is one of several kinds of upfront fees illegal in
NY.)
The Studio Models website home page said: "Advertise
your skills for runway, commercials, ads, movies and
more with the world's premier online booking agency."
Why does "the world's premier online booking agency" not
have tear sheets to prove it? Why make a claim of global
domination with nothing to back it up? How is that not
ridiculous?
The staff page did not list any credentials for anyone.
They said: "Our staff is always ready to work hard
to get you the hottest models for clients, and the best
exposure for our talent. We look forward to working with
you."
Another website indicated Studio Models accepts model
scouts from off the street, basically. They pay other
people to scout for them. There is no indication, however,
either their scouts have any qualifications to scout,
or the scouts they would pay would need any qualifications
or industry experience to scout. This approach and business
model fits sales and upfront fees but not genuine model
scouting.
Interestingly there appears to be a double standard.
Because the model scouts from outside they pay by commission,
but they want upfront fees from the models. Why are they
not paid by commission, i.e. after the site gets models
work?
Studio Models provided a client list, but, as you already
noted, there are no tear sheets, so you don't know if
they are just making it up the way scam agencies do.
You don't want to assume advertising is true in the
modeling industry when there are no tear sheets and the
company wants upfront fees.
There is a BBB
listing for Studio Models in Philadelphia,
which has a different address from the one you provided,
but the principal or owner in the BBB record matches
the name of the owner on the Studio Models website.
The BBB consumer complaint information: "Complaints
against this business concern selling practices and service
issues."
You raised an important topic when you said: "I
didn't bring the agency any photos of myself, and so
he was just going off my face-to-face looks. Is this
also normal to just sign someone by the way they look
in person and no photos?"
No, not at all. Because there are people who look great
face to face, but they do not photograph particularly
well. Just as there are those who do not look particularly
great face to face, but they are great in front of a
camera.
There needs to be a test shoot. You need to question
any company or agency that wants upfront fees or skips
the test shoot and wants to go straight from seeing you
to an expensive portfolio, comp cards, or any upfront
fees.
The website provided no history, no date of origin,
no success story page. There are no quotes from leaders
and clients who said they used the website.
The conclusion, therefore, is either Studio Models is
successful, but does not advertise well; or they are
not successful, so they have nothing to promote themselves.
Of course this begs the question, if they cannot promote
themselves well, why would you trust them to promote
you to clients?
For several reasons, therefore, it is difficult to justify
paying this company for anything.
There are three main issues in evaluating a modeling
agency, three basic questions to ask:
1) Are they reputable?
2) Are they successful?
3) Are there upfront fees?
In this case there is no indication they are reputable
or successful, but they want upfront fees.
Shop around. In a city as large as Philadelphia, you
must be able to find agencies which are reputable, successful,
and do not charge upfront fees.
To Whom It May Concern:
I only recently came upon your website and noticed that Studio
Models USA was listed.
The address I visited was the same as the one listed
in the letter that already exists on your site:
Studio Models USA
209 North 3rd Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106
(215) 627-3244
www.studiomodelsusa.com
I had a similar experience to the girl whose letter
appears on your site in that I saw an ad in a local paper,
called, and set up a meeting time. This was in early
November.
At my meeting, I provided them with a few pictures,
filled out a little form about my experience, asked a
few questions; then was given a business card and asked
to call back a day or two later to find out if they were
interested in me.
I did as I was asked and was told that they were interested,
and that I should come back in to discuss plans for a
photo shoot.
I was asked to bring a check for $114.95; $95 was for
an "online set-up fee," and $19.95 was for
my first month's "monthly marketing fee."
When I went back, I was told that they had no contract
and I could cancel at any time. They asked for my check
and then the photo shoot was discussed.
The photo shoot was to be with their photographer and
a makeup artist was to be provided at their studios later
that month.
The photo shoot was free; however, I had to do my own
hair and makeup. I actually found out that I needed to
do this by accident.
They called me the day of my shoot to see if I could
come in earlier, and I said that I could not.
I then asked if I should bring my own makeup for the
makeup artist.
The person talking to me said, "You have to do
your own makeup and hair at home before you get here.
Our person will only do touch-ups."
This made a little nervous, because I am no professional,
but I went ahead that evening, because I had already
paid them money, and had been told that canceled shoots
would cost an extra $100 for the photographers' and makeup
artists' wasted time.
At the photo shoot, I was given a name and a password
to access my online comp card to update the information.
That evening I went home and followed the supplied directions
to update my information.
When I checked a few days later, my pictures and information
was not on the site. When I checked a week later,
and still nothing appeared, I contacted the agency.
I was told that the pictures had just arrived and would
be updated on the site by the end of the week with my
information.
I checked back a week later and my pictures were loaded,
but there was no information.
I called again, and was told that in time my information
would appear.
That was in mid-December, and now it is late January,
and still the information has not been updated.
Currently, limited information appears, but only because
I pressured them to type in the information themselves.
As for the photos, I was given a CD of the pictures
that they took; however, they were not good in quality
at all.
I was not consulted about which pictures were to appear
on the site, nor given any chance to see the pictures
in advance.
I was also given no instructions as to how to access
and print off pictures from the CD, such as which photo
program to use.
Consequently, even though it was free, I have not been
able to use this to my advantage.
The part that really made me upset was that when I received
my bank statement for December, I saw that this agency
had made a withdrawal from my checking account for $19.95.
I never signed any papers allowing them to make such
withdrawals without prior consent. This made me feel
as if my money was being taken from me. Theft.
After this occurred, I called the agency and left a
message asking to be called back. I did not say why I
wanted them to call me back, only that I wanted to discuss
with them what services I was being provided.
Weeks have passed, but still no one from their agency
has called me; in fact, they have not contacted me at
all. On the contrary, any contact has been through my
steadily pursuing them.
Recently, I began to search every page I could access
of their website. I came across a contract, even though
I was told that their agency had no contract, and that
I could cancel any time.
I also came across a statement in the frequently asked
questions page that said: "We do not charge a set-up
fee to post your photos. You pay only a small fee of
$19.95/month to be in our database."
But I have a receipt from the agency that clearly states
that I was charged $95 for an online set-up fee.
I emailed their customer service department today, asking
that they stop "representing" me (which in
truth they are not really doing, anyway), and that they
explain why they have charged me a set-up fee when their
website says that the agency does not charge one; why
I was charged a monthly posting fee in November when
nothing was posted until December; why they took money
out of my account in December without my authorization;
and why their site has a contract posted, but I was told
that nothing of that matter exists.
I have received no email back yet; however, not much
time has elapsed since I sent my message.
Can you think of anything else that I could do to rectify
this issue or any way that I could possibly get my money
back from them?
Any information you could provide me with would be much
appreciated.
Thank you in advance for your help.
B.A.
B.,
Your complaints are reasonable and you make a good case.
Have you contacted your bank? Unauthorized withdrawals
from your bank account is something you should discuss
with your bank, especially if the company does not respond
to you.
You can and probably should also contact the BBB. At
the time of writing the BBB record for SM USA says: "The
company has responded to customer complaints brought
to its attention by the Bureau." Therefore if you
direct your complaints to the BBB, you could get their
attention.
The BBB record also included Customer Complaint Information: "Complaints
against this business concern selling practices and service
issues."
Service issues could obviously include customer service,
which is a part of your complaint.
The basic problem with upfront fees is a company can
lose interest in you pretty quickly.
If your complaint with the BBB does not produce a satisfactory
result, you can escalate and file a complaint with the
Attorney General's office.
Finally you could ask for your money back since they
have done nothing for you with their virtually worthless
online photo post. It probably gets most of its page
views from their webmaster.
Paying $95 for the "online set-up fee" is
ridiculous. Find out where they come up with that price.
A teen or even a preteen could upload a digital picture.
Many of them do.
The "monthly marketing" for $19.95 every month
is a scam if nobody sees your picture, either because
it is not online, or nobody downloads it. If it is not
seen, no marketing has taken place. If no marketing has
taken place, but they say it has, that is fraud. If they
want you to pay (in advance) for something that does
not happen, it's a scam.
In any case, if an agency has to make money from upfront
fees, it is probably pathetic because it cannot get models
good enough modeling jobs to earn them a significant
income on commissions.
Studio Models USA Letters Index
|