Also closely implicated is Richard Surber the nephew of
the convicted pump & dumper Allen Wolfson, currently in jail.
Mr Surber is the cousin of, and former business associate of, Mr
David Wolfson who was recently named in SEC litigation with Sukumo:
( 15. Sukumo Limited (a.k.a. The Sukumo Group, The Fujiwara Group, First
Chartered Capital Corporation, First Colonial Trust, First China Capital,
International Investment Holding) is a British Virgin Islands corporation
that appears to be operating out of Thailand and Lao, People's Democratic
Republic ("Laos"). Sukumo marketed the stock of Stem Genetics,
Inc., F10 Oil & Gas Properties, Inc., Diversified Financial Resources
Corporation, Valesc Holdings, Inc., and NCI Holdings, Inc. to overseas
investors in the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp18413.htm
Mr. Surber, via Axia, also had a business relationship with Mr. Newman
( First Colonial Trust).
Richard Surber has been in contact with this site and requested
that a counter-balance of views and information be allowed. Naturally,
potential investors are eager to have an informed choice, so his
contributions are included.
Date:
3/29/2004 14:22:36 EST
From: HudConsult@aol.com
Subject: Re: Misinformation/Libelous Statements
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Mr. Henderson:
Hudson Consulting Group, Inc. is a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of Diversified
Holdings-I, Inc. (a Nevada Corporation) which is in turn a 99% owned
subsidiary of Nexia Holdings, Inc.. (OTCBB: NXIA).
Allen Wolfson nor any of "his" entities has ever held any shares
in Hudson Consulting Group, Inc..
Furthermore, Allen Wolfson has NEVER held any significant share amounts
of Nexia Holdings, Inc..
Allen Wolfson did however hold a controlling interest in Axia Group,
Inc. fka CyberAmerica Corp.. He was forced out of Axia when he was indicted
for the crimes for which he now sits in prison.
The disclosures concerning his exit are of public record. I included
links to such disclosures.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/788738/000078873800000083/0000788738-00-000083-0001.txt
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/788738/000078873800000085/0000788738-00-000085-0001.txt
Unfortunately, you are correct that Axia did have a relationship through
First Colonial Trust with Mr. Newman. Again, I have attached the disclosure
which outlines that relationship.
To date, I have not had a single call or email from any investor claiming
that First Colonial lied about the state of Axia (which is a public shell
with no current operations) in an effort to induce them into buying shares
of Axia.
I have had a single email from one investor stating that he was told
the shares were free trading which of course they are not. I have included
links to such disclosures on this matter as well which clearly delineate
the relationship.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/788738/000078873803000167/axia10qsb.txt
Below is the pertinent portion of the disclosure which clearly shows
that Axia was not playing hide the ball with respect to its relationship
to First Colonial. Nonetheless, it appears that no one is interested
in the fact that every person who has Internet access could clearly see
the terms of the Reg S offering.
A direct link from the axia website was in place to the www.sec.gov at
that time as well.
On July 9, 2003, Axia entered into an Offshore Stock Purchase Agreement
(the "Agreement") with First Colonial Trust, a British Virgin
Islands corporation (Colonial).
Pursuant to the Agreement Colonial has the right to purchase up to 5,000,000
shares of Axia common stock pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities
Act of 1933 at a purchase price equivalent to 30% of the bid price per
share on the day that Axia receives payment from Colonial for the specified
number of shares to be reflected in written buy orders sent to Axia.
The Agreement calls for Axia to deliver a certificate in the amount of
5,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock (Certificate) to a designated
escrow agent within 14 days of the day the Agreement was executed.
Colonial will only be deemed to have voting control or the power to dispose
of that portion of the shares of common stock that will be released at
the direction of Colonial upon payment being rendered in U.S. dollars
to Axia or a designated third party escrow agent.
It is anticipated that subsequent to the delivery of the Certificate
representing such shares, Colonial will begin drawing against the Certificate
at Colonial's discretion, excepting that at no time will Colonial have
direct or indirect beneficial ownership of more than 9.9% of the total
issued and outstanding shares of Axia.
Colonial may at its option resell the shares to its clients in compliance
with Regulation S or hold such shares for their own account.
In the event Colonial acts as a selling agent with respect to reselling
the Axia shares, Colonial is responsible for disclosing any mark ups,
commissions or other consideration Colonial or its representatives receives
directly or indirectly as a result of reselling the Axia shares.
In any event, Axia will only receive 30% of the proceeds from any such
resales of up to 5,000,000 shares based upon the bid price on the day
of such sale. As of the date of this filing, Axia's best bid price was
$0.30. The bid price of Axia is subject to change based upon market fluctuations.
Accordingly, the net dollar amount Axia receives could fluctuate significantly
if the market price of Axia's common stock rises or falls substantially.
Select Representations Made by Colonial
Under the terms of the Agreement Colonial has represented the following:
Federal and State Securities Laws. Colonial knows and understands the
laws passed by the Federal Governments of the countries wherein they
will resell the shares issued to Colonial under this agreement and the
accompanying rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commissions of those countries and the corresponding laws passed
by the different counties and states' Securities divisions wherein Colonial
conducts its business. Colonial expressly warrants and represents to
Axia that at all times during the term of this agreement that they shall
abide by all Federal, County and State securities laws, rules and regulations
of the United States of America or any other country wherein Colonial
conducts its business.
Further, Colonial agrees and warrants that it shall in no manner compromise
Axia by the violation of any such laws, rules or regulations. Colonial
understands that Axia will abide by the securities laws and that Axia
expects Colonial to abide by the securities laws. If Colonial fails to
abide by any such law, this agreement shall immediately be terminated
and Axia shall no longer be bound by the terms hereof.
Representations to Colonial's Clients. Colonial agrees that all representations
made by it, its sales agents, brokers, dealers, customer service representatives
or any other agent of Colonial who solicits the purchase of these securities
by an investor shall be complete and accurate and shall contain only
the information that is available to the market places. Colonial shall
not disseminate any information to its clients that is not completely
accurate and factual.
If Colonial becomes aware that any of its sales representatives
are disseminating information that is not
completely accurate, Colonial shall take all necessary steps to prevent
further dissemination of the information and shall take all necessary
steps to correct the information with the investors to whom the information
has been passed.
General Overview of Regulation S
Regulation S provides generally that any offer or sale that occurs outside
of the United States is exempt from the registration requirements of
the Securities Act of 1933, provided that certain conditions are met.
Regulation S has two safe harbors.
One safe harbor applies to offers and sales by issuers, securities professionals
involved in the distribution process pursuant to contract, their respective
affiliates, and persons acting on behalf of any of the foregoing (the "issuer
safe harbor"), and the other applies to resales by persons other
than the issuer, securities professionals involved in the distribution
process pursuant to contract, their respective affiliates who are not
officers or directors, and persons acting on behalf of any of the foregoing
(the "resale safe harbor").
An offer, sale or resale of securities that satisfied all conditions
of the applicable safe harbor is deemed to be outside the United States
as required by Regulation S. The distribution compliance period for shares
sold in reliance on Regulation S is one year.
Axia has complied with the requirements of Regulation S by having no
directed selling efforts made in the United States, by selling only to
buyers who were outside the United States at the time the buy orders
originated, ensuring that each person is a non-U.S. person with address
in a foreign country and having each person make representation to Axia
certifying that he or she is not a U.S. person and is not acquiring the
Securities for the account or benefit of a U.S. person other than persons
who purchased Securities in transactions exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act; and also agrees only to sell the
Securities in accordance with the registration provisions of the Securities
Act or an exemption therefrom, or in accordance with the provisions of
the Regulation.
Legend
Axia's transfer agent has been advised to place the following legend
on each certificate representing shares of Axia being sold in conjunction
with the Agreement:
These securities are subject to restrictions on transferability and resale
and may not be transferred or resold except as permitted under the Act,
applicable state securities laws, pursuant to registration or exemption
therefrom.
Investors should be aware that they will be required to bear the financial
risks of this investment for an indefinite period of time. All offers
and sales of the herein-described securities by non-U.S. persons before
the expiration of a period commencing on the date of the closing of this
offering and ending one year thereafter shall only be made in compliance
with Regulation S, pursuant to registration under the Act, or pursuant
to an exemption from registration, and all offers and sales after the
expiration of the one-year period shall be made only pursuant to registration
or an exemption from registration. Hedging transactions involving these
securities may not be conducted unless in compliance with the Act.
Limited Market for Common Stock.
There is currently a limited trading market for our shares of common
stock, and there can be no assurance that a more substantial market will
ever develop or be maintained. Any market price for shares of common
stock of Axia is likely to be very volatile, and numerous factors beyond
our control may have a significant adverse effect.
In addition, the stock markets generally have experienced, and continue
to experience, extreme price and volume fluctuations which have affected
the market price of many small capital companies and which have often
been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies.
These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic and political
conditions, may also adversely affect the market price of our common
stock.
Further, there is no correlation between the present limited market price
of our common stock and our revenues, book value, assets or other established
criteria of value. The present limited quotations of our common stock
should not be considered indicative of the actual value of Axia or our
common stock.
Risks of Penny Stock.
Axia's common stock (OTC BB: AXGR) is deemed to be a "penny stock" as
that term is defined in Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Penny stocks are stocks (i) with a price of less than $5.00 per share;
(ii) that are not traded on a "recognized" national exchange;
(iii) whose prices are not
quoted on the NASDAQ automated quotation system (NASDAQ-listed stocks
must still meet requirement (i) above); or (iv) in issuers with net tangible
assets less than $2,000,000 (if the issuer has been in continuous operation
for at least three years) or $5,000,000 (if in continuous operation for
less than three
years), or with average sales of less than $6,000,000 for the last three
years.
There has been a limited public market for our common stock during the
last five years. There is no assurance that the current price level will
continue, as there has thus far been low volume, and our stock may be
deemed to be penny stock at any time. Section 15(g) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 15g-2 of the Securities and
Exchange Commission require broker/dealers dealing in penny stocks to
provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny
stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the
document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor's
account. Potential investors in our common stock are urged to obtain
and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any shares that
are deemed to be a "penny stock."
Moreover, Rule 15g-9 of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires
broker/dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor
for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stocks to that
investor.
This procedure requires the broker/dealer to (i) obtain from the investor
information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience
and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information,
that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that
the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably
capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide
the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which
the broker/dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive
a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming
that it accurately reflects the investor's financial situation, investment
experience and investment objectives.
Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult for investors
in our common stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise
dispose of them.
This is the document terminating the relationship.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/788738/000078873803000170/axia8k.txt
The bottomline is that I had no reason to beleive that Sukumo, First
Colonial or Newman were doing anything illegal. My cousin David Wolfson
(a recent law school graduate), Gino Carlucci (represented that he was
an unlicensed attorney), attorneys for Axia, a purported attorney for
First Colonial, and counsel
for Diversified Financial Resources, Inc. all reviewed the transactions
with Sukumo/First Colonial.
There were no investor complaints that I was made of aware of before
entering into the transaction between Axia and First Colonial.
Given Axia's financial resources, I did as much due dilligence as possible
which included hiring outside counsel to review the transaction before
entering into the agreement with First Colonial.
I had no reason to believe that anyone was doing anything wrong with
respect to the sale of securities offshore. I was told that the investors
were high net worth individuals who frequently invested in high risk
ventures.
Axia immediately terminated the relationship as soon as there was reason
to beleive that Michael Newman and co. were using illegal boiler room
tactics Axia netted less than $70,000---The shares issued to the investors
in most cases were issued at a discount to market.
The investors who put there money into shares of Axia have not lost their
investment. It is still a viable public vehicle which I hope to find
suitable reverse merger candidate. There is a good chance that those
investors stand to make a profit on there initial investment.
Sincerely,
Richard Surber
President and Director of Hudson Consulting Group, Inc.
Dear Mr. Surber,
In your earlier response you state that:
"Furthermore, Allen Wolfson has NEVER held any significant share amounts
of Nexia Holdings, Inc.."
In a Nexia filing he was deemed to be a “control person”:
Date of Event: February 15, 2002 Nexia Holdings, Inc.
Prior to June 29, 2000, Mr. Allen Wolfson was deemed to be a "control
person" of the Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) by virtue of his beneficial ownership
of over 5% of the Company's common stock, and the potential influence
Mr. Wolfson had with respect to the Company's day-to day operations in
his role as a finder of potential transactions for the Company, and as
business consultant to the Company. Mr. Wolfson is also the uncle of
Richard Surber, the Company's president, chief executive officer and
director.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/833209/000078873802000091/nexia8k02.txt
Could you put a percentage figure on his holdings and perhaps also explain
how you were originally introduced to First Capital( Newman )?
The progression seems to be
Ozolutions
F10
Stem Genetics
Diversified/ NCI Holdings
Then Axia.
I had hoped for more publicly accessible information but was hampered
by this notice.
Axia Group, Inc. has over the past six months gone through a complete
change in its accounting staff during the past six months. During the
same period the Registrant has sold certain assets and experienced changes
in the Registrant's operations that have created delays in the preparation
and completion of the financial statements of the Registrant. Because
of the time and resources dedicated to those efforts and the recent changes
to the Registrant's accounting staff, the Registrant will be unable to
complete the Form 10-KSB on a timely basis without unreasonable effort
or expense.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/788738/000107054404000044/axia10kext123103.txt
Looking forward to your further clarifications.
Les
Dear Mr. Henderson:
You have placed me on your site and through not so subtle means have
implicated me as a criminal. You have cut and pasted various portions
of text in
public filings and taken them out of context. I would like you to thoroughly
explain why it is you have taken the position you have against me. Outside
of
mere guilt by association. You can not show that I have committed a crime
because I have not committed a crime.
None of the U.S. companies that Hudson assisted had any knowledge that
Mr.
Newman and co. would or intended to lie in order to sell securities.
In fact,
Axia, NCIH and DFRC all thoroughly and completely disclosed their financial
condition, the restricted nature of the securities which were sold offshore,
and
the percentage of the proceeds they were to receive, ie 30% in Axia's
case.
...Furthermore, you promised to be fair and post my
version of the facts---ie The fact that Axia, NCIH, and DFRC accurately
disclosed the the restricted nature of the shares sold offshore, the
commission
structure, their respective financial conditions, etc. Each of these
companies also
obtained legal opinions as to the availability and legality of relying
Regulations S under the terms as set forth in their respective disclosures.
You
have failed to live up to your end of the bargain by posting my account
of the
facts..
If you will live up to your end of the bargain, I will gladly answer
your
question. Furthermore, I do not appreciate the implications of your statement
regarding a family "gag" order. I do not have the type of family
that would or
could gag me or anyone else.
Richard Surber 05/07/04
Surber/Canaccord/ etc...
BOTTOMLINE HOME LOAN, INC.
CANACCORD CAPITAL CORP
Surber, Richard
HEYWOOD GORDON
on June 26 , 2001, Bottomline signed a Stock Acquisition Agreement with
Buster
Williams, Jr., David Williams, Mei Chen, Caitlin Rabanera, Matt Morris, Sandra Jorgensen and Athena V. Killeen , for the purchase of 4,085,000 shares
of
Bottomline Mortgage, Inc. a California corporation. In exchange for the
transfer
of these shares in Bottomline Mortgage, Inc. and a 76% interest in its
business
and its operations, Bottomline agreed to issue to the seven named transferring
shareholders set forth above 10,000,000 shares of its common stock on
a pro-rata
basis.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1017130/000078873803000077/botsb27.txt
DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL RESOURCES,
INC.
DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INC. Balance Sheet September 30, 2002
On November 1, 2002, the Company issued 9,000,000 shares to 4 individuals
for services rendered. Those individuals are Sandra Jorgensen, Athena
Killen , Dennis Thompson, and Norman Mullis.
Athena Killen, Dennis Thompson, and Norman Mullis
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1029802/000078873802000322/dvfr10qsbsep.txt
The following represents the
assets of Investment Sanctuary transferred to Richard D. Surber
in full satisfaction of any and all debt owed to Richard D. Surber
by Investment Sanctuary:
1. The balance of cash in Investment Sanctuary's savings account with
the Key Bank of Utah, account number 440589058245 ($7,407.96);
2. 1993 Volkswagon Corrado SLC; vehicle number WVWED4508PK004290. Richard
D. Surber shall assume the current note on the vehicle held by Key Bank
of Utah, loan number 009-000000000002450412, and release Investment Sanctuary
from such obligation;
3. 1984 190E Mercedes; vehicle number WDBDA24A5EA078433;
4. $15,000 cash from proceeds of the sale of the McIntyre Building;
5. Any and all right, title and interest in stock held in the Gruntel & Co.,
Inc. brokerage account, account number 404-15384;
6. Any and all right, title and interest in stock held in the Canaccord
Capital Corporation brokerage account, account number 241201-B;
7. Any and all right, title and interest in any stock registered or issued
in the name of Richard D. Surber, which was issued or assigned prior
to October 31, 1996 as consideration for any services provided by Investment
Sanctuary.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/788738/0000788738-97-000002.txt
On January 12, 1997, the board
of directors of CyberAmerica Corporation (the "Company")
ratified the execution of three separate Offshore Securities Subscription
Agreements (the "Agreements") with three offshore entities,
namely: Leeward Consulting Group, LLC, a corporation of
the Nevis West Indies ("Leeward") with principal offices
at Main Street, P. O. Box 556, Charleston, Nevis West Indies; Karston
Electronics, LTD., a corporation of the British Virgin Islands,
("Karston") with principal offices at the Omar Hodge
Building, Wickham's Cay, Tortola, British Virgin Island; and East
West Trading Corporation, a corporation of the Nevis West Indies,
("East West") with principal offices in the National
Bank Building, Memorial Square, Nevis West Indies.
Pursuant to the Agreements,
the Company received an aggregate payment of $25,000 in exchange
for issuing an aggregate of 111,113 shares of the Company's Common
Stock all of which shares were exempt from registration pursuant
to an exemption under Regulation S promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933, (the "Act").
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.
Dated: January 15, 1998 CyberAmerica
Corporation
By:/s/ Richard Surber -------------------------
Richard Surber, President
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/788738/0000788738-98-000002.txt
STARUNI CORP
Karston Electronics, Inc. 458,333
East-West Trading Corp. 458,333
Leeward Consulting Group 458,333
Richard D. Surber 270,000
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1084384/0000788738-00-000047-index.html
By: Hudconsult27 $$$$
28 Jul 2000, 12:38 PM EDT
Msg. 13736 of 40746
(This msg. is a reply to 13701 by dotrat.)
Post By Richard Surber
SLANDER/LIBEL
This post is in response to certain persons including "dotrat." Anybody
that continues to print libelous statements or slander my name can expect
to be sued. I will investigate who you are and you can bet that I will
pursue you. I have the means and the ability. Persist and I will prove
it to you.
"dotrat" and others have no basis for claiming that I am a manipulator,
crook, an OJ Simpson etc. The claims as to improprieties are false. I never made
any claims as to price or when a RM would occur, verbal or otherwise. No predictions
have been made. No false press releases are involved. No hyping by myself or
KLYS has occurred in this stock. READ THE DISCLOSURES--IF YOU CANNOT READ, THEN
GET SOMEONE TO READ THEM FOR YOU.
Those of you who are belly aching have no business playing in penny stocks
your stomaches are too weak for it. Furthermore, I fail to understand
the logic in those who are complaining about "loosing money." The
only reason to invest in KLYS is in hopes of a good RM occurring. If
you have sold before this occurs, then your basis for investing in KLYS
was flawed from the beginning and it is your own stupidity that has lost
your money not me. If you have not sold, then you have not lost anything.
KLYS is what it is and has not been colored as anything that it is not.
As I have told anyone that has personally called me, KLYS is an extremely
high risk investment, if you cannot afford to loose your entire investment
don't invest in KLYS or similar types of deals. Your broker told you
the same, read your account disclosures on investing in "penny stocks."
ON THE REVERSE MERGER
I am and will continue to work diligently on finding a suitable RM candidate.
The impact that it will have on the price of the stock cannot be determined.
When the RM will occur cannot determined. These facts are the nature
of the beast.
My efforts have been directed at finding an exceptional candidate. Those
efforts have been impaired as a result of the liabilities that currently
exist. I believe that they can be settled over the next 6 months. However,
there are no guarantees. I
<b>I will not post again on RagingBull it is a terrible venue for delivering
accurate information.</b> However, given the degenerative and false nature
of many posts, I thought it appropriate to respond.
Signed
Richard Surber
OHANA ENTERPRISES, INC.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/30966/000101540203004080/doc1.txt
http://www.knobias.com/individual/public/quote.htm?ticker=ohna
Catherine Thompson 37 CFO, Secretary and a Director
On January 16, 2003, the Company
notified Hudson of the Company's intent to offset payments due
to Hudson under the Stock Purchase Agreement. The offset, permitted
under Section 6.5 of the Stock Purchase Agreement, was effected
by the Company due to certain alleged misrepresentations and omissions
made by Hudson in the Stock Purchase Agreement.
On March 17, 2003, Hudson
filed a Verified Complaint in the Third Judicial District Court
in and for Salt Lake County, Utah (Case No. 030905949) against
the Company and the Purchasers, alleging claims of breach of contract
and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in
the failure to pay sums due under the Stock Purchase Agreement,
and seeking damages of not less than $200,000.
On June 5, 2003, the Company
and the Purchasers filed an Answer, Counterclaim and Third Party
Complaint against Hudson, Axia Group, Inc. and Richard Surber,
denying Hudson's allegations, setting forth several affirmative
defenses and setting forth claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation
and violations of Utah and federal securities laws. At the
present time, the parties are discussing settlement of this litigation;
however, no such settlement has been reached.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/30966/000101540203004080/doc1.txt
Mr. Surber
..........has indicated that
Currently, Nexia is negotiating another acquisition with the owners
of Arizona- based better denim label Beta Project.
Surber, who met Gold through mutual acquaintances almost a decade ago.
http://www.apparelnews.net/Archive/090503/News/news.html
Corey Adams. Beta Project . Arizona.
Corey M. Adams. Nile Theatre. Arizona.
CORREY ADAMS . Cap Concerts. Arizona
Arizona Corporations Search
State v. Adams
On June 26, 1997, undercover officers with the Mesa Police Department
attended a performance by the band Eroticide at the Nile Theater in downtown
Mesa owned by Corey Adams.
Based on items found 2 more search warrants were obtained, and a grand
jury indicted Adams for 5 counts of receiving stolen property. The trial
court granted a motion to suppress all evidence obtained from a search
of the residential portion of the property.
The court of appeal upheld
suppression of the evidence. Even though the apartment was not
permitted by the zoning code, the court held Adams had an expectation
of privacy in his apartment, which was not unreasonable. Since
the warrant failed to describe the apartment, it did not cover
the search and seizure of evidence from it. The warrant only
covered the business portion of the property and not the residential
portion.
http://www.laughlin.net/retired/june_2000.htm
Corey M Adams. 12.99 ?
http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/012000/m0089303.pdf
Tue May 2, 2000 3:32 pm
Subject: [az-raves] Channel 12 you should do an interview
>Hi my name is Jen and I work for several of the media companies in
>the
>valley. I am also working on the Dateline story that will be aired
>tonight.
>Gino was given ample opportunity to sit and view the footage that
was
>taken from his illegal desert rave, he chose not to and its obvious
>that he has something to hide.
>While at this event I myself observed open drug use and sales taking
>place just a few feet from where I was standing. I also have on tape
>the open sale of "nitrous balloons" from the back of a large ryder
>truck, it appeared to be a sound truck.
>At another party at the Nile theater I was with two undercover police
>officers who bought ecstasy and arrested several individuals.
>It seems that when we ask we are told its all about the music not the
>drugs and when we go and investigate anyone of these raves there is
>always people passing out, throwing up and buying or selling drugs,
>so
>please give an interview and explain this all to the general public
>if you have nothing to hide.
>Jennifer Careaes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizona-raves/message/4671
From: "Gino " <ginoaz@y...>
Date: Tue May 2, 2000 9:57 am
Subject: Chnle 12
My my my arent we up early watching for information on this list.
Where do you get off saying that my event was "illegal" in
any way. I had permits, police, security, insurance so what gives you
the right to make a statment like that to the general public.
If you are a professional like you say how can you be so one sided and
why cant you spell?
Just from your post alone nobody in their right mind should give you
the time of day. In closing you should note that you have made a statement
you purported to be a fact to the general the public and
that can be construed as defamation. I will let this one go but you
should choose your words very carefully when you dont have all your facts
straight.
Gino Carlucci
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizona-raves/message/4662
Date: Mon Jan 1, 2001 10:01 pm
we had barely moved two yards in line, when we saw our friends who had
been there since 10 leaving to go to the nile. you know somethings up
when people are leaving anywhere to go to the nile.
we witnessed an amazing set by dj imagine.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizona-raves/message/12963
Date: Sat Mar 31, 2001 6:53 pm
Locals: Phusion, Slippe, Gino Carlucci, Nimh, Starr, K'next & MORE!
Location: Nile Theatre, Mesa AZ
Tickets: Available at Swell Records or at the door
Party Time: 9pm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizona-raves/message/15984
Saturday April 28 03:17 AM EDT ( ‘01)
Gino Carlucci filed suit in U.S. District Court in Phoenix seeking at
>least $600,000 in compensatory damages two days after an April 21
>police raid at the Downtown Event Center, 63 E. Congress.
>
>"It's not even the money that I'm interested in," said Carlucci,
who
>wants a judge to rule that the police were wrong to search and seize
>without a warrant. The lawsuit alleges that the four officers who
>walked into the concert about midnight also searched personal
>belongings, such as Carlucci's billfold, without permission.
>
>"This is America - you can't do that," said Carlucci , a
law school
>graduate who co-owns Mesa-based CAP Concerts. He said police also
>seized all of the money from a different concert at the same location
>the previous night.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizona-raves/message/18332?source=1
2002-02-22
The Urban Ministry of Sound: Raves and Religion
The Nile Theater (the site of the largest “Ectasy” drug bust
in Phoenix this year),
http://www.munk.org/wr/articles.php3?newsid=12
Corey Adams, Nile Theatre. From 10.02
NILE THEATER ORDERED BY SUPERIOR COURT TO RESTRICT “RAVE” CLUB
ACTIVITIES
http://www.maricopacountyattorney.org/Press/PDF/nile_theatre.pdf
Nile Theater enjoined by Superior Court
January 2003
The Nile Theater has now closed and owners have leased the property to
a local church.
On August 25, 2001, a homicide was committed on the dance floor when
a patron shot
three people, killing one.
http://www.maricopacountyattorney.org/Newsletters/PDF/CC_Jan_03.pdf
Interesting
|
