Scam Site Explanation of how the Prime Bank Fraud Process isn't a scam

Note: Information contained herein is not an endorsement. It is simply copied from the source as an example of what they use to dupe you into handing over your cash.

Introduction to Bank Debenture Trading Programs

What is a bank debenture trading program?

Also referred to as a secured asset management program, this is an investment vehicle commonly used by the very wealthy where the principal investment is fully secured by a Bank Endorsed Guarantee.

The principal is managed and invested to give a guaranteed high return to the investor on a periodic basis. There is no risk of losing the investor's principal investment.

This investment opportunity involves the purchase and sale of Bank Debentures within the International Market in controlled trading program.

The program allows for the investor to place his funds through an established Program Management firm working-directly with a major Trading Bank.

The investment funds are secured by a Bank-Endorsed Guarantee by the Banking institution at the time the funds are deposited. The Investor is designated as the Beneficiary of the Guarantee unless otherwise instructed by the Investor.

The guarantee is issued to secure the Investor's principal for the contract period. This guarantee will be Bank Endorsed with the Bank Seal, two authorized senior Officers' signatures, and will guarantee that the funds will be on deposit in the Bank during the contract period and will be returned fully to the Investor at the end of the contract term.

The Investor is also guaranteed by the program Directors, by contract that they will receive what is in effect a percentage of each trade made by the Trade Bank.

This can be in the form of a guaranteed profit/yield paid on a periodic basis upon terms as set forth in the contract

The Instrument to be transacted under the Buy/Sell Program are fully negotiable Bank Instrument. delivered unencumbered, free and clear of any and all liens, claims or restrictions.

The Instrument are debt obligation of the Top One Hundred (100) World Banks in the form of Medium Term Bank Debentures of 10 years in length. usually offering 7 1/2% interest; or, "Standby Letters of Credit" of one year in length with no interest but at a discount from face value.

These Bank Instrument conform in all respects with the Uniform Customs and practice for Documentary Credits as set forth by the International Chamber of Commerce, Paris, France (ICC) in the latest edition of the ICC Publication Number 400 (1983 Revision) and the newest implemented ICC Publication 500 (1995 Revision).

What is the investors risk in this program?

As stated, the Investment funds principal is fully secured by a BANK ENDORSED GUARANTEE (or, safekeeping receipt) which is issued by the Trading Bank at the time the funds are deposited.

The Investor is designated as the Beneficiary of the Guarantee which is issued to secure the principal for the contract period and all elements of risk have been addressed.

It must be stressed that, before an instrument is purchased, a contract is already in place for the resale of the Bank Debenture Instrument. Consequently, the Investors funds are never put at risk.

The trust account will always contain either funds or Bank Instrument of equal or greater value.

After each transaction period, the profits are distributed according to the agreement and the process repeats for the duration of the contract.

How often does the program to transactions?

Operations will take place approximately forty (40) International Banking Weeks per year. with specific transactions taking place approximately one or more times per week depending on circumstances"

Although there are 52 weeks in a year, there are only 40 international banking weeks during which transactions take place.

An International Banking week is a full week which does not include an officially recognized holiday. However, this does not preclude that transactions may occur on short weeks that have a holiday.

Why are these "high returns with safety" programs not generally publicized?

The answer is that these programs have been available, though not widely known for years, However, because of the extremely high minimum requirements to enter them, only a few could qualify.

The minimums have been 10 to 100 million dollars previously.

Only recently have the smaller minimums been available so that more can qualify and yet have the opportunity to earn exceptionally high and safe profit yields.

Also, The Investor must be "invited in" to participate in these very limited enrollment programs.

Individual programs can quickly become filled and are then closed to further Investor participation.

Leveraged trading programs

By leasing assets, usually in the form of United Sates government Treasury Bills, for a fraction of their face value, the ability to purchase and subsequently resell bank instrument in large quantities is possible.

This is the principal on which leveraged treading-programs revolve.

The leased assets provide the collateral against which the instrument are purchased and resold, with the entire process taking only one or two days to accomplish.

The large profits produced by trading programs is created by the difference between the purchase cost and resale price of the instrument.

Even with a net profit of four per cent per transaction, the process of buying and selling can be performed several times each week, providing for profits which make the return on other investments pale by comparison.

A four per cent profit produced just once weekly for forty weeks would total 160%.

By leasing assets, the profit is generated on a much larger amount of instrument, greatly increasing the total dollar profit.

For example, if a four percent profit were generated on $100 million, the net profit would be $4 million.

Leasing assets typically requires the payment of three percent of the face amount per month, in advance: to lease $100 million in assets would require the payment of $3 million.

However, by using the leased assets, profits can be generated on $100 million worth of instruments ($4 million), not just $3 million ($120,000).

Even if just one transaction occurred during the month, the profit created would exceed the cost of leasing the assets.

History and Development of Bank Instruments

Picture the world at war in 1944. All of Europe, except for Switzerland, is pounding its infrastructure, manufacturing base and population into rubble and death.

Asia is locked into a monumental straggle which is destroying Japan, China, and the Pacific Rim countries.

North Africa, the Baltic's, and the Mediterranean countries are clutched in a life and death struggle in the fight to throw off the yoke of occupation. A world gone mad!

Economic destruction, mad, human misery and dislocation exists on a scale never before experienced in human history.

What went wrong? How could the world rebuild and recover from such devastation? How could another war be avoided?

Keynes, Harry White and Bretton Woods

This was the world as it existed in July 1944 when a relatively small group of 130 of the western worlds most accomplished economic, social and political minds met in upstate New Hampshire at a small vacation town called Bretton Woods.

John Maynard Keynes, the man who had predicted the current catastrophe in his book, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, written in 1920, was about to become the principal architect of the post-World War II reconstruction Keynes presented a rather radical plan to rebuild the worlds economy, and hopefully avoid a third world war.

This time the world listened, for Keynes and his supporters were the only ones who had a plan that in any way seemed grand enough in foresight and scope to have a chance at being successful.

Yet Keynes had to fight hard to convince those rooted in conventional economic theories and partisan political doctrines to adopt his proposals.

In the end, Keynes was able to sell about two-thirds of his proposals through sheer force of will and the support of the United States Secretary of the Treasury, Harry Dexter White.

At the hart of Keynes proposals were two basic principals: first the Allies must rebuild the Axis Countries, not exploit them as had been done after WW 1; second, a new international monetary system must be established, headed by a strong international banking system and a common world currency not tied to a gold standard.

Keynes went on to reason that Europe and Asia were in complete economic devastation with their means of production seriously crippled, their trade economies destroyed and their treasuries in deep dept.

If the world economy was to emerge from its current state, it obviously needed to expand. This expansion would be limited if paper currency were still anchored to gold.

The United States, Canada, Switzerland and Australia were the only industrialized western countries to have their economies, banking systems and treasuries intact and fully operational.

The enormous issue at the Bretton Woods Convention in 1944 was how to completely rebuild the European and Asian economies on a sufficiently solid basis to foster the establishment of stable, prosperous pro-democratic governments.

At the time, the majority of the world's gold supply, hence its wealth, was concentrated in the hands of the United States, Switzerland and Canada.

A system had to be established to democratize trade and wealth; and redistribute, or recycle, currency from strong trade surplus countries back into countries with weak or negative trade surpluses.

Otherwise, the majority of the world's wealth would remain concentrated in the hands of a few nations while the rest of the world would remain in poverty.

Keynes and White proposed that the United States supported by Canada and Switzerland would become the banker to the world, and the U.S. Dollar would replace the pound sterling as the the medium of international trade.

He also suggested that the dollar's value be tied to the good faith and credit of the U.S. Government not to gold or silver, as had traditionally been the support for a nation's currency.

Keynes concept of how to accomplish all of this was radical for its time, but was based upon the centuries old framework of import/export finance.

This form of finance was used to support certain sectors of international commerce which did not use gold as collateral, but rather their own good faith and credit, backed by letters of credit, avals, or guarantees.

Keynes reasoned that even if his plans to rebuild the world's economy were adopted at the Bretton Woods Convention, remaining on a Gold standard would seriously restrict the flexibility of governments to increase the money supply.

The rate of increase of currency would not be sufficient to insure the continued successful expansion of international commerce over the long term.

This condition could lead to a severe economic crisis, which, in turn, could even lead to another world war.

However, the economic ministers and politicians present at the convention feared loss of control over their own national economies, as well as, run-away inflation, unless a "hard-currency" standard were adopted.

The Convention accepted Keynes' basic economic plan, but opted for a gold-backed currency as a standard of exchange.

The "official" price of gold was set at its pre-WW II level of $ 35.00 per ounce One U.S. Dollar would purchase 1/35 an ounce of gold.

The U.S. dollar would become the standard world currency, and the value of all other currencies in the western, non-communist world would be tied to the U.S. dollar as the medium of exchange.

Marshall plan. IMF. World Bank and Bank of International Settlements

The Bretton Woods Convention produced the Marshall Plan, the Bank for Reconstruction and development known as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Bank of International Settlements (BIS).

These four would re-establish and revitalize the economies of the western nations.

The World Bank would borrow from rich nations and lend to poorer nations. The IMF working closely with the World Bank, with a pool of funds, controlled by a board of governors, would initiate currency adjustments and maintain the exchange rates among national currencies within defined limits.

The Bank of International Settlements would then function as a "central bank" to the world.

The International Monetary Fund was to be a lender to the central bank of countries which were experiencing a deficit in the balance of payments.

By lending money to that country's central bank, the IMF provided currency, allowing the underdeveloped country to continue in business, building up its export base until it achieved a positive balance of payments.

Then, that nation's central bank could repay the money borrowed from the lMF, with a small amount of interest and continue on its own as an economically viable nation.

If the country experienced an economic contraction, the IMF would be standing ready to make another loan to carry it through.

Bank of International Settlements

The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) was created as a new central bank" to the central banks of each nation. It was organized along the lines of the U.S. Federal Reserve System and it's principally responsible for the orderly settlement of transactions among the central banks of individual countries.

In addition, it sets standards for capital adequacy among the central banks and coordinates the orderly distribution of a sufficient supply of currency in circulation necessary to support international trade and commerce.

The Bank of International Settlements is controlled by the Basel Committee which, in rum, is comprised of ministers sent from each of the G-10 nations central banks.

It has been traditional for the individual ministers appointed to the Basel Committee to be the equivalent of the New York "Fed's" chairperson controlling the open market desk.

World Bank

The World Bank, organized along more traditional commercial banking lines was formed to be lender to the world" initially to rebuild the infrastructure, manufacturing and service sectors of the European and Asian Economies, and ultimately to support the development of Third World nations and their economies.

The depositors to the World Bank are nations rather than individuals. However, the Bank's economic "ripple system" uses the same general banking principles that have proven effective over centuries.

The tie that binds: the bank of international settlements and the World Bank

The directors of both banks are controlled by the ministers from each of the G-10 countries: Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Luxembourg.

Bretton Woods under pressure

By 1961, the plans adopted at the Bretton Woods convention of 1947 were succeeding beyond anyone's expectation.

Proving that Keynes was right. Unfortunately, Keynes was also right in his prediction of a world monetary crisis.

It was brought on by a lack of sufficient currency (U.S. dollars) in world circulation to support rapidly expanding international commerce.

The solution to this crisis lay in the hands of the Kennedy Administration, the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of International Settlements.

The world needed more U.S. Dollars to facilitate trade.

The U.S. was faced with a dwindling gold supply to back such additional dollars. Printing more dollars would violate the gold standard established by the Bretton Woods agreements.

To break the treaty would potentially destroy the stable core at the center of the worlds economy, leading to international discord, trade wars, lack of trust and possibly to outright war.

The crises was further aggravated by the belief that the majority of the dollars then in circulation was not concentrated in the coffers of sovereign governments, but rather in the vaults or treasuries of private banks, multinational corporations, private businesses and individual personal bank accounts.

A mere agreement or directive issued by governments among themselves would not prevent the looming crisis.

Some mechanism was needed to encourage the private sector to willingly exchange their U.S. Dollar currency holdings for some other form of money.

The problem was solved by using the framework of a forfait finance; a method used to underwrite certain import/export transactions which relies upon the guarantee or aval (a form of guarantee under Napoleonic law) issued by a major bank in the form of either documentary or standby letters of credit or bills of exchange which are then used to assure an exporter of future payment for the goods or services provided to an importer.

The system was well established and understood by private banks, government and the business community world wide.

The documents used in such financing were standardized and controlled by international accord, administered by the members of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) headquartered in Paris.

There would be no need to create another world agency to monitor the system if already approved and readily available documentation, laws and procedure provided by the ICC were adopted.

The International Chamber of Commerce is a private, non-governmental, worldwide organization, that has evolved over time into a well recognized organized, respected and, most of all, trusted association.

Its members include the worlds major banks, importers, exporters, merchants, and retailers who subscribe to well-defined conventions, bylaws, and codes of conduct over time, the ICC has hammered out pre-approved documentation and procedures to promote and settle international commercial transactions.

In the ICC and forfeit systems lay the seeds of a resolution to the looming crisis.

Recycling the current number of dollars back into world commerce would solve the problem by avoiding the printing of more U.S. dollars and would solve the problem by avoiding the printing of more U.S. dollars and would leave the Bretton Woods Agreement intact.

If currency, dollars, could be drawn back into circulation through the private international banking system and redistributed through the well known "bank ripple effect", no new dollars would need to be printed, and the world would have an adequate currency supply.

The private international banking system required an investment vehicle which could be used to access dollar accounts, thereby recycling substantial dollar deposits.

This vehicle would have to be viewed by the private market to be so secure and safe that it would be comparable with U.S. Treasuries which had a reputation for instant liquidity and safety.

Given the "newness" of whatever instrument might be created, the private sector would prefer to exchange their dollars for a "proven" instrument (United States Treasuries) but selling new Treasury issues to the would not solve the problem.

In fact, it would exacerbate the looming crisis by taking more dollars out of circulation. The World needed more dollars in circulation.

The answer was to encourage the most respected and creditworthy of the world's private banks to issue a financial instrument guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the issuing bank, with the support from the central banks, lMF and Bank of International Settlements.

The worlds private investment and business sector would view new investments issued in this manner as "safe".

To encourage their purchase over Treasuries, the investor yield on the new issues would have to be superior to the yield on Treasuries.

If the instruments could be viewed as both safe and providing superior yields over Treasuries, the private sector would purchase these instruments without hesitation.

The crisis was prevented by encouraging the international private banking sector to issue letters of credit and bank guarantees, in large denominations, at yields superior to U.S. Treasuries.

To offset the increased costs to the issuing banks, due to the higher yields accompanying these bank instruments, banking regulations within the countries involved were modified in such a way as to encourage and or allow the following:

Reduced reserve requirements via off-shore transactions.
Support of the program by the central banks. World Bank, IMF and Bank of International Settlements.
Off-balance sheet accounting by the banks involved.
Instruments to be legally ranked "para passu" (on the same level) with depositors funds.
The banks obtaining these depositor funds would be allowed to leverage these funds with-the applicable central bank of the country of domicile in such a way as to obtain the equivalent of federal funds at a much lower cost.
When these "leveraged funds'" are blended with all other accessed funds, the overall blended rate cost of funds to the issuing bank is substantially diminished, thus offsetting the high yield given to attract the investor with substantial funds to deposit.

The bank instruments offered to investors were sold in large denominations often $100 million through a well established and very efficient market mechanism, substantially reducing the cost of accessing the funds.

The reduced costs offset the higher yields paid by the issuing banks.

Multi-use instrument

Major commercial banks soon came to realize that these instruments could serve as more than a "funds recycling and redistribution tool", as originally envisioned.

For the issuing bank, they could provide a the means of resolving two of the bankers major problems: interest rate risks over the term of the loan, and disinterthediation of depositor funds.

Bankers, now for the first time, had available a reliable method of accessing large amounts of money in a very cost efficient manner.

These funds could be held as deposits at a predetermined cost over a specific period of time.

This new system to promote currency redistribution had also given private banks a way to pass on to third parties the interest rate and disinterthediation risks formerly borne by the bank.

The use of these instruments providing instant liquidity and safety has worked amazingly well since 1961.

It is one of the principal factors which has served to prevent another financial crisis in the world economies.

In recent years, smaller banks not ranked among the top 100 have been issuing their own instruments.

Considering the dollars volume and the number of instruments issued daily, the system has worked extremely well.

There have been few instances where a major bank has had financial problem.

In all cases, the central bank of the G-10 country concerned and the Bank of International Settlements have moved quickly to financially stabilize the bank, insuring its ability to honor its commitments.

Funds invested in these instruments rank para passu with depositors accounts, and as such, their integrity and protection is considered by all the institutions involved as fundamental to a sound international banking system.

The bank instruments program designed under the Kennedy Administration is still used very effectively to assist in recycling and redistributing currency to meet the worlds demand for commerce.

Insufficient gold supply

Another significant change of the Bretton Woods Agreement came in 1971, when the volume of world trade using U.S. dollars as the medium of exchange, finally exceeded the ability of the United States to support its currency with gold.

The restraints of the gold standard at $35 per ounce established under the Bretton Woods Agreements placed the United States in a very precarious position.

As Keynes had predicted, there was not enough gold in the U.S. Treasury to back the actual number of U.S. dollars then in circulation.

In fact, the treasury was not really sure how many paper dollars actually were in circulation.

What they did how, however, was that there was not enough gold in Fort Knox to back them. The problem was that the U.S. Treasury was not the only institution aware of this fact.

All G-10 countries were aware of this. If demand were placed upon the U.S. Treasury at any one time to exchange all the Eurodollars for gold, the U S. Treasury would have had to default, thereby effectively bankrupting the United States government

France, the United Kingdom, Germany and Japan were concerned about their substantial holdings in U.S. dollars. If just one of these countries demanded gold for dollars.

Then a meeting between ambassadors to the U.S took place with Connelly ,who was then Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, and Undersecretary of the Treasury, Paul Volker.

Connelly listened to the ambassador and said, " I will answer you tomorrow".

Nixon, Connolly and Volker, in an ultra-secret weekend meeting with the brightest of the nation's bankers and economists gathered to ponder "tomorrow's" answer.

Honoring the demand meant certain death to the U.S. as an economic super power.

Not meeting the demand would have catastrophic results. Was there a way out? What if the U.S. unilaterally abandoned the gold standard and let its currency float in the market?

Nixon and his advisors viewed the dilemma in terms of two mutually-exclusive alternatives: increasing the value of U.S. gold reserves and maintaining a gold-backed economy, or considering the repercussions to the worlds economies if the U.S. dollar were no longer backed by gold.

To resolve the crisis, the U.S. needed to unilaterally abandon efforts to maintain the official price of gold at an artificial level of $35 per ounce the same price that existed in 1933.

Gold in 1971 had a market value of approximately $350 to $400 per ounce in the commercial world market, or about 10 times the official price.

By letting gold seek its market price, the U.S. Treasury's gold would automatically become worth approximately 10 times its value at the official price.

Under these circumstances, any government bank or private investor would have to exchange $350 to $400 U.S. dollars for an ounce of gold at the market price rather than one U.S. dollar to acquire 1/35th of an ounce of gold at the old official price.

An ounce of gold would rise in exchange value by a factor of ten, and the U.S. Treasury's gold supply would increase correspondingly.

In addition, once the gold standard established at Bretton Woods at $35 per ounce was abandoned, why reestablish it at $350 an ounce?

The same problem would eventually arise again, and Keynes would be right again.

Why not adopt Keynes' original idea of a currency, being backed by the good faith and credit of its government, its people, the national resources and its production capacity?

The United States needed to let its currency "float" in value against all other world currencies and not tie it to gold. Market forces would set the dollar's value through its exchange rate with other foreign currencies.

Nixon and his advisors also realized that business world-wide had long ceased conducting international trade through gold and silver exchanges.

Therefore, taking the dollar off the gold standard and allowing its value to float in relation to other world currencies would create currency risks for international trade transactions, but it would not preclude or stall international commerce.

The world of international business had, in practice, already abandoned the gold standard years before, considering it cumbersome and unworkable.

Moreover, the other Western nations had neither the economic nor military power to force the U.S. to honor its commitment to the gold standard and, therefor, could not prevent it from abandoning the standard.

Based upon a clear understanding of these two interrelated realities. Nixon and his advisors determined to abandon the gold standard and allow the U.S. dollar to "float" in relation to other nations' currency.

The exchange rate would no longer be determined by an artificially-maintained gold standard, but rather by the value placed on each currency in the foreign exchange market

Nixon and Kennedy

The system for controlling currency supply, established by the Kennedy Administration, became an indispensable tool to the Nixon administration.

The IMF and the Bank of International Settlements insured that the U.S. dollar would hold its value in the international market and was recycled from countries with a positive balance of payments back into the world economy.

The illusion of U.S. dollar backed by gold was gone.

The preceding information explains the use of bank instruments as an alternative investment vehicle to United States government notes, and how and why the process of issuing bank instruments used in trading programs began and continues today.

Detailed Overview

RISK FREE CAPITAL ACCUMULATION

by the means of participation in a

BANK DEBENTURE FORFEITING PROGRAM

PROFIT FUNDING (DEPOSIT) LOAN TRANSACTION

In the United Sates of America the supply of money or credit regulated by the Federal Reserve, an independent body which came in to existence by an act of congress in 1913, and in part by means of the recognition and authorization granted by the International Chamber of Commerce and certain key International Money Center Banks.

Money Center Banks comprise the top 250 banks worldwide, as ranked by net assets, long term stability and sound management.

The Money Center Banks are also referred to a the top 100 or fewer (as for example the Fortune 500 or Fortune 100) and are authorized to issue blocks (aggregate amounts) of Bank Debenture instruments such as Bank Purchase Orders (BPO's), Medium Term Debentures (MTDs) such as Promissory Bank Notes (PBNs Zero Coupon Bonds (Zero's), Documentary Letters of Credit (DLCs), Stand By Letters of Credit (SLC's) or Bank Debenture Instruments (BDI's) issued under the International Chamber Of Commerce (not to be confused with your local Chamber Of Commerce) is the worldwide regulatory body for the International banking community, and sets the policies which governs the activities and procedures of all banks conducting business at international levels.

Capital accumulation by banks of bank debenture trading (forfeiting) programs: (Reference ICC No. 500 revised 1995)

Authority to issue a given allotment of the above described banking instruments: over and above those regularly employed as an accommodation to customers regularly engaged in international trade: is issued quarterly for each issuing bank, according to the Federal Reserve's or Central Bank's review of each bank's portfolio.

The prices of these instruments are quoted as a percentage of the face amount of the instrument, with the initial market price being established when first issued.

Thereafter, as they are resold to other banks they are sold at escalating higher prices, thus realizing a profit on each transaction, which can take as little as one day to complete.

As these instruments are bought and sold within the banking community the trading cycles generally move to the higher level banks to the lower (smaller) banks.

Often they move through as many as seven or eight trading cycles, until they are eventually sold to a previously contracted retail customer or "Exit Buyer" such as a pension fund, trust fund, foundation, insurance company, etc., that is seeking a conservative, reasonable yield instrument in which they "park" or invest, for a certain period of time, the larger sums of cash they regularly hold.

By the time these instruments ultimately reach the "retail" or secondary market level they are of course selling at substantially higher prices than when originally issued.

For example, while the original issuing bank might sell a "Zero" at 82 1/2% of its face value, by the time the "Zero" finally reaches the "Retail/exit" buyer it can sell for 93% of it's face value.

Since these transactions are intended for use by large financial institutions, they are denominated in face amounts commonly ranging from US $10 million, and up.

For currencies other than US Dollars, usually Swiss Francs or German Marks, the Central Bank or other regulatory authority corresponding to the Federal Reserve of the country issuing the currency, uses similar procedures to control the availability of cash and credit in their own particular currencies.

There has been a lot of interest expressed by persons seeking to learn more about risk free Capital Accumulation, by participating in a FORFAITING Program.

Essentially we are discussing a Money Center Bank instrument or Bank Debenture Purchase and Resale Program, in which these monetary securities are bought at a beneficial lower price and then sold in the money markets, at a higher price, before, a transaction is committed to the traders, they always ensure that they have a guaranteed EXIT SALE. (another party willing to purchase the bank debentures at an agreed higher price, at the conclusion of a number of trading cycles).

If no Exit Sale is available and agreed to before the transaction starts, then no program will take place as the trader must always protect his position, and that of his clients.

This is of course is the ultimate safety factor for the client.

This type of transaction is known as a FORFAITING PROGRAM, and is often referred to by insiders as a "trading program", because once a program is started it will normally move through several cycles, accumulating profits at each trading cycle.

The process is made possible because the trader commits to the purchase of many millions of dollars in either Bank Purchase Orders (BPO) or Medium Term Notes (MTN's), at a substantial discount off the face value of the securities.

Sight Draft Letters Of Credit are pledged to secure the transaction and the discounted price of the bank instruments or bank debentures made available to the trader by the issuing Money Center Bank might for example, the as low a eighty cents on the dollar or less, depending upon market rates at any given time.

The first transaction might have some other trader willing to pay eighty three cents for the short term use of the funds, which revert back to the first trader often in a matter of hours.

Each trading cycle earns profits at a few cents on the dollar, but the transactions are in the millions of dollars, and when one considers the probability of four, five or more trading cycles per month, then it is not difficult to realize the profitability of this type of transaction.

The internal trading of these banking instruments is a privileged and highly lucrative profit source for participating banks, and as a result, these opportunities are not generally shared with even their very wealthiest clients.

It would the difficult, at best to entice investors to purchase Certificates of Deposit yielding 2.5% to 6% if they were aware of the availability of other profit opportunities from the same institution, which are yielding much higher rates of return.

The banks always employ the strictest Non-Disclosure and Non-Circumvention clause in trading contracts to ensure the confidentiality of the transactions.

They are rigidly enforced, and this further accounts for the concealment of these transactions from the general public. Participation is an insider privilege.

As a result, virtually every contract involving the use of these high-yield Bank Instruments contain explicit language forbidding the contracted parties from disclosing any aspect of the transactions for a period for five years.

As a result there is difficulty in locating experienced individuals whom are knowledgeable, and willing to candidly discuss these opportunities and the high profitability associated with them, without severely jeopardizing their ability to participate in further transactions.

One needs to have the appropriate banking connections and relationships to control the transactions from the beginning to end.

For this purpose it is not uncommon to have:

A purchasing bank which represents the buyer (trader) on the purchasing side of the transaction and which is also acting as the "holding Bank"
A Fiduciary, or "Pass Through Bank"
An Issuing or "Selling Bank".

In this manner each bank is knowledgeable only with regards to its portion of the overall transaction, and receives a nominal, and reasonable fee for its services, from its respective clients.

Further complicating the structuring of profit-oriented programs involving the instruments is the differing tax and banking rules and regulations in various jurisdictions around the world .

For example, in those jurisdictions where regulations may not permit banks to directly purchase these instruments from other institutions, or conversely where profitability may the actually enhanced through tax incentives, "Profit Funding" (Deposit Loan) Programs collateralized by bank instruments, have been developed to structure these transactions as loans, rather than simple "Buy and Sell" transactions.

For example, in Germany, where progressive tax rates mitigate against high interest rates, the concept of an Emission Rate lower than the face value of the loan has been widely used to further enhance a lenders profit.

Suffice it to say that a wide range of methods have been developed to maximize the net after-tax profit for all parties involved in such yields.

The key to safety and profits

As is quite evident from the forgoing, the key to profitability of these Bank Instruments lies in having the contacts, initial resources, and where withall to purchase them at the level comparable to the issuing bank, and thus receive the maximum discount while also having the necessary resources and contacts to negotiate the instruments to the most profitable level of the retail or secondary markets.

As one might imagine, those contacts are most zealously guarded by those traders regularly and commercially involved with these instruments.

As a result, the real secret of successful participation lies in not the how, why and wherefore of these transactions, but and more importantly, in knowing and developing a strong working relationship with the "Insiders", the principals, bankers, lawyers, brokers, and other specialized professionals whom can combine their skills and run these resources into lawful, secure and responsible programs with the maximum potential for safe gain.

As a result of years of successful associated business, our principals have established personal contacts, and sources of information which can provide current, reliable information regarding:

	The constantly changing availability of Money Center Bank Instruments from the original issuers.
	The sources of information which can provide timely and reliable information regarding the ever changing customers, in the "retail or secondary markets".
	The ability to ensure the all-important exit sale.

Armed with this information and the financial capacity to control a purchase and resale of these instruments, a window of opportunity is thus made available to circumvent needless intermediaries, and to profit from the enhanced "spread" between the issuing price and the final retail price.

"Too good to be true"

From time to time a potential American or Canadian Investor, when first presented with the opportunity to participate in a Western European Capital Accumulation Program or Loan Deposit Transaction may be very skeptical about the existence and authenticity of such programs.

This is quite understandable, but it invariably means that the potential investor is:

Not familiar with the profit opportunities that qualified European Investors have enjoyed for the past 50 years.
Not at all familiar with the type of program proposed, and not able to ask the right questions.
Thinking he is being offered something for nothing, which as we all know is absolutely impossible.
Saying to himself. "If this is such a good deal why don't the Europeans keep it to themselves, why do they invite me to participate"!
Not really understanding the procedures involved, and the important safeguards which are in place to protect his invested capital at all times, against loss.

And last, but not least, the potential investor has all too often not taken the time to read and understand the very comprehensive literature provided and as a result may rush to the wrong conclusion and lose an important opportunity.

The truth is that there is no smoke and mirrors involved.

All of the programs are conducted under the specific guidelines set up by the International Chamber Of Commerce (ICC and your local Chamber Of Commerce is not affiliated), under its rules and regulations generally known as ICC 500.

The ICC is the regulatory body for the world's great Money Center Banks in Paris, France. It has existed for more than 100 years, and exerts strict control on world banking procedures.

The U.S. Federal Reserve, is a very important member, but unlike most other central banks, operates independently of the ICC, and as a result the vast majority of U.S. citizens have not been made aware of the money making opportunities already available for fifty years to qualified European Investors through ICC-affiliated banks.

However, it should the pointed out that a few major U.S. banks do participate from within their banking operations based in Switzerland and the Cayman island, but they do not normally make their programs available to Americans living in the United States, and the chances are very great that your local branch manager has absolutely no knowledge of them, and may even deny their existence.

Only the worlds most powerful and stable Money Center Banks take part in these programs.

At the end of each year, commencing on December 15th, the West European Money Center Banks engaged in FORFAITING and Deposit-Loan transactions close their counters to new transactions, and make commitments as to the types of programs and the amount of money that they will commit to those programs for the coming years.

The first consideration for any participating-banking always:

The preservation of the Investor's capital as the primary and overriding responsibility.
Well secured and managed investment programs, with the potential for high returns to the participating investors.
The constant maintenance of the client's confidentiality and trust against any and all unwarranted intrusion from any unwelcome source.
The ongoing fiscal stability and ethical integrity of the European banking structure. No runaway speculation in stocks or real estate, no inflationary fiat paper money supplies printed by an irresponsible debt-ridden government, and no politically inspired tinkering leading to savings and loan and banking collapses, or economic crashes, so as to endanger the overall investment and business environment, and the life savings of private investors.

Once the banks have defined the programs for the coming year they are made available to qualified individuals through principals, or as they are also known, "providers".

The banks themselves are NOT allowed to take part in the management of the programs, this would lead to a massive cartel generating huge unregulated profits.

The banks do, however, manage to make substantial profits from the program in the form of fees. Program management is the job of the Providers, and there are only a few of them in all the world-wide banking industry.

The providers themselves is also NOT allowed to trade or do business on their own behalf, so this presents an opportunity for qualified investors to take part and to profit as the initiators of the various transactions.

Until recently these privileged opportunities were not offered outside of the Western European markets, but as the world economy has continued to grow, and more real money pours into the safety of West European markets they need to put this capital to work earning profits.

This has allowed for the door to the opened for the first time to American and Canadian Investors and provide them with a unique opportunity to accumulate capital a confidential manner; and to decide for themselves how and where that capital will be disbursed.

In the course of a calendar year a number of programs are introduced, by Money Center Banks in London, Antwerp, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Vienna, Zurich, and other major West European banking centers.

These programs are open only for as long as it takes them to become fully subscribed. Once the committed funds are exhausted then the program closes, and will not the re-opened that year.

Each program comes with it's own parameters and requirements, and will not the changed, nor subject to alternate proposals by potential investors.

In every transaction your funds are secured by Money Center Bank Guarantees. A Money Center Bank Guarantee is a collateral document, issued by the major West European Bank that is underwriting the transaction.

This document absolutely and irrevocably protects the safety of your capital while it is taking part in a capital accumulation program, or FORFAITING transaction.

The mechanics of bank SLCS and guarantees

(Source: Unknown Economist / Accountant of a Major US Corporation under direction of its Board of Directors)

Please note Bank Guarantees or SLCs are short hand terms and are trade jargon, the proper name for such is BANK DEBENTURES.

The driving force behind the financial instruments under discussion in this paper is the U.S. government through its monetary agency, the Federal Reserve Board.

The U.S. dollar is the basis of the world's liquidity system since all other currencies base their exchange rate on it. Quite simply this means that the U.S. is the world's central banker.

As the world's central banker, the U.S. has an enormous responsibility to maintain stability in the world's monetary system.

As well, the U.S. as the most powerful nation has accepted the role as the champion and promoter of democracy in all of its endeavors.

While the U.S. has many tools to do this, one in particular is relevant for the purposes of this discussion.

The Federal Reserve Board (Fed) uses two financial instruments to control and utilize the amount of U.S. dollars in circulation internationally: Standby Letters of Credit (SLC) and Prime Bank Guarantees (PBG).

The Fed's domestic tools to control credit creation are interest rate policy, open market operations, reserve ratio policy and moral persuasion.

In the domestic context, these tools are not always as effective as the Fed would like them to be.

Part of the reason for the less than perfect effectiveness is due to the substantial stock of U.S. dollars in foreign jurisdictions.

Several of the Fed's domestic tools cannot be used by it in other countries. For examples, the Fed cannot change foreign reserve ratios.

Furthermore, a significant amount of credit creation occurs in U.S. dollars in foreign countries, particularly in the Eurodollar market.

The Fed cannot control the credit creation in foreign markets through its use of domestic policy instruments.

Internationally the currency of choice is the U.S. dollar as it is considered the safest currency, especially in times of political crisis.

Consequently those holding the dollar do so for reasons which are less sensitive to economic stimuli.

Because foreign banks readily accept U.S. dollar deposits, those funds, which in the domestic context are the basis of M1 money supply, in the foreign context, they act more like the near money features of M3.

This means they are infinitely more difficult to control. The offshore market has grown substantially in the last two decades for a number of reasons.

First, huge quantities of U.S. dollars associated with the drug trade slosh around the international monetary system, and second, wealthy individuals concerned about high taxes and preserving their wealth opt to keep their assets in offshore tax havens.

This significant stock of U.S. dollars cannot be effectively controlled by the U.S. with its normal domestic policy tools.

Finally, currency futures markets can be another difficult area to control because of the substantial amount of leverage that is available. For example, for as little as $1500 dollars, it is possible to short or go long for over $150,000 U.S. dollars versus the D Mark.

All other major currencies have a similar leverage on the dollar.

This means that someone with $1500 U.S. dollars can take the other side in a Fed move to stabilize the currency.

Since the currency does not have to be delivered, but the contracts are rolled near the expiry date, it is possible to create substantial pressure on the dollar in either direction. (The Hunts learned this the hard way when they tried to corner the world silver market.)

To control U.S. dollars outside the U.S., the Fed resorts to Standby Letters of Credit or, as they are popularly known, SLCs.

In its more familiar domestic form, the SLC is a financial guarantee or performance bond issued by a bank for a fee on behalf of a customer that wishes to borrow funds but in unable to do so cheaply in credit markets.

A bank guarantees the borrower's financial performance to the lender by issuing the SLC.

Since the bank is in a better position to assess credit risk and demand collateral, the issuance of this form of guarantee is a natural service that a bank provides.

In the international markets the use of SLCs is somewhat different.

It simply is a money-raising device where the financial guarantee is almost meaningless. Banks issue these SLCs on behalf of the Fed; in other words, the Fed is the customer of the bank.

Obviously there is no credit risk here. The net proceeds from the funds raised are immediately wired to the Fed. Using this method, the Fed can reduce the U.S. dollars in circulation in foreign jurisdictions.

Using a different method, the large stock of expatriated dollars is employed by the Fed to promote U.S. foreign policy.

For example, during the G7 meeting in Tokyo in April of 1993, the U.S. committed financial aid to Boris Yeltzin to the tune of $6 billion.

These funds do not come form the U.S. Treasury, nor is the merit of the loan debated in the U.S. Congress.

Instead, the U.S. taps the international pool of U.S. dollars through an instrument called a Bank Guarantee (PBG).

Essentially the instrument has the features of an SLC except it is longer dated with 10 and 20 year maturities. Unlike SLCs which sell at a discount and bear no interest, PBGs bear a coupon payable annually in arrears.

Like the SLC, it is a form of guarantee ensuring the lender will receive interest as is due and be repaid the principal upon maturity.

It is important that the U.S. has these tools to control the dollars that increasingly grow off its borders.

The Fed operates its currency stabilization so effectively through the use of SLCs that it seldom resorts to intervening in the foreign exchange markets.

Rather than the U.S. government tapping the domestic savings pool to assist foreign governments, it is able to tap the international pool of expatriated U.S. dollars that leak away from its shores in hundreds of millions daily.

Commonly asked questions by secondary brokers of fraudulent prime bank schemes before they realize they are themselves being duped.

Some people say they've never found a program that works, how do I respond?

A few people may tell you that in the past, a program they (or one a friend or colleague) have entered did not perform. So the programs available do not perform; the programs presented have the highest likelihood of success.

Other people say these programs do not exist, how can I convince them these programs are real?

Only programs which provide for a meaningful guarantee for principal are considered. If there is no possibility for the loss of principal, why would anyone spend the time and effort to promote a sham that didn't earn any money?

I have a client who is a skeptic, how should I approach them?

Full disclosure is made to the potential joint venture partner upon the receipt of Proof of Funds, Letter of Intent, and Letter of Authority. These three documents do not cost the client anything and do not put funds at risk.

The client can then perform their own due diligence, including talking to the parties involved. In this way, the client is then able to convince themselves that the programs operate as stated.

How do I explain my role in this to a prospect?

You are in the role of finding joint venture partners to participate in one or more Bank Debenture Trading programs. Your efforts are directed toward finding these joint venture partners.

Why can't I accept "up-front" fees?

Fees taken in advance lead to a high degree of skepticism and in some states, illegal.

How do I build trust in these programs?

Once funds have been prove to exist the client is encouraged to perform their own due diligence. By doing so, the client is relying on themselves to gather the facts and make a decision.

What about brokers I bring in?

Other brokers under you will receive whatever portion of your commission you designate in the Agreement you sign with them.

Are client references available?

The transactions which a client enters are kept in the strictest confidence by all parties which is consistent with a five-year period of non-disclosure contained in most joint ventures. Joint venture partners expect that since these transactions are not public, their involvement remains confidential.

Similarly, a joint venture partner brought in by you would not want to the contacted by others considering becoming a joint venture partner.

What exactly are bank credit instruments?

Bank credit instruments are conditional bank obligations, similar to a check cashable under certain circumstances, issuer credit worthiness being the criteria. In these instances, they are general obligations of the issuing institution, without reserves for repayment being set aside.

Stipulation is not as direct liability in the balance sheet but in the Notes to the financial statement a contingent liabilities.

While not secured obligations, the implications would the quite serious for the banking industry if a major institution defaulted on any payment due, secured or unsecured.

How is the investment (transaction) risk contractually eliminated?

Prior to purchase, at a known cost effected contractually, there must the a buyer in place for a profitable resale. This buyer must have demonstrated proof of funds.

If all these conditions are not met there is no transaction and hence, no loss is possible.

Since the original purchase and resale are contractual, most executions are simultaneous, like a double escrow involving real estate. At all times, the commitment is either (1) 100% in cash. or (2) pre-sold instruments. Hardly any risk in either situation.

Concurrent with the closing (instantaneous in most instances), any debt incurred to finance the purchase is paid off; the loans is on a non-recourse basis with the lender relying solely on the instruments held as collateral for security; a process called FORFAITlNG.

There's no publicly available instrument even remotely comparable; why aren't some of the largest institutions (pension funds and insurance companies) major investors? In addition, why have these instruments and programs never been the subject of articles in investment publications?

Most money managers, oriented only toward commonly-known investment are unaware and have not been exposed. Further, they do not realize the differences in (1) the type of investment vehicle. (2) how it is issued, (3) the frequency of the transactions, (4) the requirements for investing, (5) how to perform due diligence, and (6) the lack of knowledge by the general public.

Because of this lack of knowledge, the returns sound "too good to the true" when compared to public-type investments. In addition, reported sources of these types of instruments deny their existence; however, some of these institutions are investors, according to managers contracted personally.

The main reason for this lack of knowledge is that all United States banks deny the existence of these programs or dismiss them as scams.

There are only five domestic issuers; all are large money-center banks and their abilities are known only at the highest level within the banking community (meaning that most banks are completely unaware).

These issuers cannot acknowledge the existence of such programs because (a) they are concerned that Publicity about raising capital might the deemed a public offering and the subject to regulation by the SEC and (b) disintermdiation (the switching by large depositors) from low-paying deposits to those with much larger profits.

In addition, there are several other reasons, including that:

	most issuers are European,
	the programs are privately offered, not publicly
	intermediaries who introduce the programs are not banks
	advertising for these Programs is by word of mouth
	instruments are not subject to regulations of the SEC (and therefore do not appear in printed materials)
	the issuance is irregular with different values
	there is no visible exchange media with public quotations
	the large size of the offerings would not create public interest
	there is no readily available referencing
	the investors are anonymous in general be buyers in the secondary markets; however, the Comptroller of the Currency has regularly testified that these instruments do not exist.

For all these reasons, there has never been any media exposure. No responsible journalist would publicize either the instruments or programs when the sources deny their existence and there is no supporting evidence.

In fact, chaos would the the end result if the programs or instruments became publicized.

There would the the potential of regulatory problems and the disruption of established relationships with substantial depositors.

Who are the most likely investor prospects?

Any qualifying individual or institutions, including the managers of retirement and profit-sharing plans, insurance companies, trust companies, charitable trusts, corporations with surplus funds, savings banks, money managers, portfolio managers, investment bankers, private bankers, and business managers.

What are the major attractions of this type of investment?

The large returns are not even comparable to any other form of investment yet the security and liquidity offered is second only the obligations of the United Sates government.

[Up]

Crimes of Persuasion

Schemes, scams, frauds.