Counterfeit Check
for Lottery Sweepstakes Fees - Senior Victims
Consumer Advisory: Lottery Scam With Fraudulent Brita Checks
Targets the Elderly
OAKLAND, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 22, 2004--The Brita(R) Products
Company today issued a warning about a lottery scam targeting elderly
consumers throughout the United States.
Victims of the scam report receiving a letter that claims they have won
a large cash prize from the International Lottery Sweepstakes of Canada,
accompanied by a fraudulent Brita check to cover lottery fees.
To collect their winnings, victims are instructed to deposit or
cash the check, and then send the equivalent amount of money to an
address in Canada. In some cases, victims have reported receiving
multiple letters and checks, as well as telephone solicitations from
individuals claiming to represent the International Lottery Sweepstakes.
The Brita Products Company has no connection to the Canadian lottery
and is in no way involved with any promotion resembling this scam.
The company is making every attempt to alert consumers, and has notified
law enforcement agencies in an effort to identify the perpetrators
as quickly as possible.
Counterfeit Lottery Check Scam Leave Elderly
Victim Broke
06/23/04 - Wisconsin - Telemarketing scammers - "telescammers," I
call them - use their professional, friendly voices, and their cold-blooded
greed, to get to other people's money.
They are so convincing that Mr. S., who is 76 and handicapped, left his
cozy home just to withdraw money from his savings account and forward
it to those telescammers. (Mr. S no longer has a savings account.)
For the past six months, Mr. S. has received more than 120 telescammer
calls. Each 15- to 20-minute call was designed to "feel Mr. S. out," to
see whether he qualified to be their next victim and to set him up to
fall into their trap - and it worked.
Mr. S received a telephone call March 1 from "Mr. Drake," who
was happy to inform him that he had just won the grand prize of $2.8
million.
Mr. S. wanted to believe it, but told Mr. Drake that he had received
many similar calls in the past. This time Mr. S. needed proof.
He also told Mr. Drake that the other callers requested money "up
front" to claim the big prize. He adamantly told Mr. Drake not to
bother him again if it was going to cost him to win the $2.8 million
- Mr. S. was not sending anyone a dime.
Mr. Drake understood completely. In fact, he told Mr. S. that it sounded
as though he had been called by phony telecommunicators.
Mr. Drake told Mr. S. that he had to be careful not to believe everyone
who called him. He assured Mr. S. that his winning the $2.8 million was "for
real" and that he would not have to send one dime.
He told Mr. S. that he would immediately send out a confirmation letter,
plus the necessary papers for Mr. S. to sign to release the prize money.
Mr. S. received his confirmation packet March 10 - six pages from First
Federated Holdings Ltd., North American Prize Award Division, a Division
of Eurotrust Corp., London-Bern-Toronto.
The official-looking letter, notarized by Mark Bailey of British Columbia,
stated: "The money is in a special insured account, and preparations
need to be made for the immediate disbursement thereof, as the funds
must begin to be disbursed by April 4, 2004, or a different prizewinner
must be awarded ... as your account has been assigned to me, David King,
I am the only person authorized to speak with you about these matters
... allow me to extend my best wishes. I take great pleasure in being
allowed to award this money to you."
The instructions included an untraceable phone number that Mr. S. was
to call immediately upon receiving the package, so "We know it arrived
safely ... then we will assist you in completing the papers."
Mr. S. called the number and spoke to "King," who was elated
that the papers arrived safely and quickly. After helping Mr. S. complete
the six phony pages, King told Mr. S. that $7,500 was required for money
transfer and lawyer fees.
Mr. S. told King that he did not have $7,500. King "understood," and
said he would make an exception. He told Mr. S to release a $9,761.34
check from his $2.8 million. King would send the check immediately, he
said, and then Mr. S. should deposit the check and forward the $7,500
for money-transfer fees. King reminded Mr. S. that the money was being
deducted from his $2.8 million prize money.
Mr. S. received a certified check March 15 for $9,761.34. He deposited
the check and withdrew $7,500, but decided it would be safer to send
the money in three installments.
On March 18, Mr. S. sent a $2,500 money order via Western Union to an
address in British Columbia.
Mr. S. sent another $2,500 money order March 19 from the same Western
Union. The workers there became alarmed when they saw that second large
money transmission, so they asked him whether everything was OK. Mr.
S. replied that his son needed the money, but decided to send the third
$2,500 money order from a different Western Union.
On March 20, Mr. S. learned that the official-looking certified check
for $9,761.34 was a fake. He also found out that he now owes his bank
the $7,500 that he withdrew off the check.
Sussexsun.com
Nigerian Counterfeit Check Lottery
Scam
12/27/04 - Texas - The Sheriff's Department is the last place Thomas
McRee, 77, expected to be Monday morning after Christmas. He was
there to sort out the mess that has cost him more than all of his
life savings.
It all began last month with a letter to his wife, Barbara, from an Australian
lottery company. It said they were the lucky winners of the Oz 6/45 lottery.
Their share of the winnings: $800,000.
Oz sent the McRees a check for more than $14,000 and then asked the couple
to send almost that full amount back to cover insurance, taxes, and customs
fees. They were given two days to reply.
The McRees sent three separate Money Grams to the company, but they found
out on Christmas Eve that the check the company sent them was no good.
"I thought there was something fishy about it, but all along, I thought I was
using their money they'd sent," Thomas said. "It never once occurred, 'cause
the check looked official and the bank accepted it."
Thomas met with the Upshur County Sheriff, who says, unfortunately, it
will be hard to track down the scam artists.
"The chances are slim anytime because it's in another country," Anthony Betterton
said. "And by the time you get law enforcement involved, the company doesn't
exist, it's a vacant building, they've already moved, and moved onto bigger and
better things."
"I'm not happy about it," Thomas said. "It's not a really good Christmas present."
Fearing his wife could go to jail for unknowingly writing a hot check,
Thomas went to his bank to ask VP Jerry Richardson for more time to raise
the money. Richardson says the bank won't take any action until after
the holidays, when he can call the lottery company to find out more information.
Meanwhile, the McRees will ask their family and friends to help them
come up with $14,000.
www.kltv.com
Advance Fee to Western Union Creates Victim
Loss by Lottery Winner for Fake Check at Bank
By Maureen Boyle, Enterprise staff writer
01/05 - Boston, MA - What a Brockton woman thought was a $7 million lottery
windfall wound up costing her more than $9,000 after she fell victim
to one of the latest lottery scams to hit the area.
The 32-year-old woman was told via e-mail by a Toronto, Canada, outfit
that she had won $7 million — and then was sent a $9,500 check
to cash.
But there was a hitch. Before the winnings could be sent, she had to
send a MoneyGram for $9,500 for "processing fees" to the company so a
special account could be set up for her. She cashed the $9,500 check
last month at her local bank, sent out the MoneyGram and waited for word.
It came from her bank: The $9,500 check from the Toronto company was
phony. The money she was given by the bank when she "cashed" the check
would be taken out of her account.
It was one of a handful of lottery scams police throughout the region
say they see each year and one of the first luring victims via e-mail.
"People are so thrilled at the thought that they will have this money, they don't
want to believe it's not true," Brockton Lt. William Conlon, chief of detectives,
said. "If it looks too good to be true, it is."
Lottery scams represented 2 percent of all Internet fraud cases in the
first six months of last year, according to the National Fraud Information
Center, a group founded by the National Consumer's League.
Most of the complaints investigated locally involve lottery scams headquartered
in Canada, with the elderly often falling victim.
Taunton police Detective Dennis Smith said he investigates about two
lottery scam cases a year in which con artists call potential victims
by phone with the "news" they won a jackpot.
The scenario is always the same: the "winner" must send cash via Western
Union or other means to a location in Canada for an account to be set
up to put the winnings in.
"It is always progressive. At first it's $1,000. If they get $1,000 from you,
they tell you there is one more thing that needs to be done. It is another $1,500
that needs to be sent. They keep upping it. They just keep going and drain you.
They keep going until you get tired or you run out of money," Smith said.
Smith said he hasn't seen anyone using e-mail yet in the lottery scam.
But it may just be a matter of time, said Raynham Deputy Police Chief
Louis J. Pacheco.
"Every conceivable scam that can be done in person can be done 10,000 more on
the Internet," Pacheco said. "Nothing on the Internet is what it seems."
In the Brockton case, a woman was sent an e-mail, sprinkled with grammatical
errors, from a group identifying itself as the "Depository Financial
Services" in Toronto. The e-mail told her she won $7 million and would
be getting a check for $9,500, Conlon said.
But she needed to send, by a MoneyGgram, the same amount to the company
so they could open a "credit line" for her, he said. MoneyGram is an
international money-transfer service.
The e-mail, with its grammatical errors, should have given the woman
a hint something was amiss, he said.
"We will equally opened a credit line with your bank to enable them receive and
accept the above mentioned sum into your bank account with bank," the e-mail
read.
The e-mail said she had to forward a $9,500 "clearance fee" to the company
before the winnings could be sent out, he said.
"Payment must be made through Western Union transfer or Moneygram," the e-mail
read.
The woman got the $9,500 check from the company, cashed it at her local
bank then went to Wal-Mart in Avon to send out the cash to the Canada
company, Conlon said.
She wound up paying $9,762.85 — the amount for the "fee" plus other
fees to send the money — with hopes of getting the $7 million payout,
Conlon said.
What she got was a letter from her bank, telling her the check from the
company was no good, Conlon said.
She was told she was responsible for the money she received. That meant
the money would be taken from her own account.
"You need to do some double checking to make sure these things are true," Conlon
said. "If you really thought about it, if you stepped back, you would know it
was phony."
Smith said he tracked one of the lottery scam operations to Canada about
11/2 years ago and talked to the man who picked up the cash from a Western
Union sent by a Taunton woman.
"He was nothing but a runner. He was approached in a coffee shop in Canada and
offered $100 to pick up the money," Smith said. "It is just a fly-by-night boiler
room operation."
Lottery
Fee Bad Check Turns Victim into Multiple Loser - article
|
